Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:01]

ARTISTS O'CLOCK. THREE O'CLOCK. GOOD AFTERNOON, EVERYONE WE'RE READY TO GET STARTED. WITH OUR SEPTEMBER 19TH 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. AT THIS TIME, MADAM CLERK YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

COUNCIL MEMBER, CUTHBERT. COUNCIL MEMBER JONES COUNCIL MEMBER, SMITH LEE. PRESIDENT MEYER'S COUNCIL MEMBER. WESTBROOK VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR PERM. THANK YOU. NEXT IS ITEM TO

[2. Closed Session]

CLOSE SESSION ITEM. A. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MEETING IS TO CONVENE IN A CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO 2.2 DASH 37 11 83 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION OR CONSIDERATION OF THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE AND THE DISPOSITION OF PUBLICLY HAVE REAL PROPERTY WHERE DISCUSSION THE OPEN MEETING WITH ADVERSELY AFFECT THE BARGAINING POSITION OR NEGOTIATING STRATEGY OF THE PUBLIC BODY. SPECIFICALLY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY AND SEVEN AND EIGHT OF THE COURT OF VIRGINIA FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING LEGAL ADVICE AND STATUS UPDATE FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY AND LEGAL CONSULTATION REGARDING THE SUBJECT OF SPECIFIC LEGAL MATTERS REQUIRE THE PROVISION OF LEGAL ADVICE BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. SPECIFICALLY INCLUDED IN OUR LIMITED TO DISCUSSION REGARDING CHAPTER 107 OF THE CITY CODE 58.1 DASH 608.3 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA SECTION 33-6 OF THE PETERSBURG ZONA ORDINANCE, 15.2 DASH 2100 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA ARTICLE SEVEN. SECTION NINE OF THE VIRGINIA CONSTITUTION AND OTHER MINDS REQUIRED TO LEGAL ADVICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MARY HILL. I MOVED THERE WERE GOING TO CLOSE SESSIONS STATED BY THE REASONS THEREFORE, RIGHT? COUNCILOR, MS SMITH LEE. SECOND, MADAM CLERK.

COULD YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL? COUNCIL MEMBER, SMITH LEE. COUNCILOR MYERS COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK, VICE ALRIGHT MR WILLIAMS? YES SIR. THE MAYOR WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CONCLUDE THE CLOSED SESSION CALLED TODAY AND CERTIFYING ACCORDANCE WITH 2.2 37 12. THE CODE OF VIRGINIA. THE ONLY HAS MANAGED LAWFULLY IDENTIFIED. THE MOTION, WHICH WILL CLOSE SESSION WAS CALLED, WERE DISCUSSED DURING THE CLOSED SESSION. ANY MEMBER BELIEVES THERE'S A DEPARTURE FROM THE FOREGOING HE SHALL SO STATE FOR THE RECORD IDENTIFYING THE SUBSTANCE DEPARTURE, WHICH HE BELIEVES HAS OCCURRED. THIS REQUIRES A ROLL CALL THAT ALL RIGHT. COUNCILOR WESTBROOK. I MOVED HERE WE COME OUT OF CLOSED SESSION. ALL RIGHT. COUNCILOR MYERS SECOND MADAM CLERK. CAN YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL? COUNCIL MEMBER EXPERT. COUNCIL MEMBER JONES. I REMEMBER SMITH LEE. COUNCIL MEMBER MYERS COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK, VICE MAYOR HILL I PERM IN OPEN SESSION. ALL RIGHT. COUNSELING CUT BIRTH.

VICE MAYOR HILL SECOND. MOTION A SECOND, MADAM CLERK. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCIL MEMBER, CUTHBERT. COUNCIL MEMBER JONES. I COUNSEL MEMBER SMOOTHLY I MYERS. COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK , MAYOR HILL. MAYOR PERM PAST THANKS. UM COUNCILMAN. MYERS. THERE WAS ANYTHING ELSE. THE THING. ALL RIGHT, WELL, WE'LL MOVE RIGHT ALONG INTO ITEM THREE. WHICH IS DISCUSSION AND

[3.a. Discussion and/or consideration of a request to appeal the Planning Commission recommendation of approval of 2023-REZ-05 (2255 Jamestown Road).]

CONSIDERATION. ITEM THREE. A IS DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION REQUEST TO APPEAL THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF 2023 ARE EASY THAT 05 22 55 JAMESTOWN ROAD. IS THAT MY CAR YOU DOING? WELL, HOW ABOUT YOU? GREAT HI. MAYOR HAD COUNCIL. THANKS FOR HAVING ME TONIGHT. I WANTED TO PRESENT TO YOU AND APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FOR 2023 REZONING 05. FOR THIS IS THIS WAS A CASE THAT WAS PRESENTED TO PLANNING COMMISSION AND THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH A PROFFER FOR THE REZONING OF 2 TO 55 JAMESTOWN ROAD TO INDUSTRIAL AND 2 TO 6 TO COUNTER DRIVE ROAD TO INDUSTRIALISM. WELL, AFTER THAT MEETING ON AUGUST 28TH. WE RECEIVED A REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL OF THE CASE AND THE APPEAL OF THE RECOMMENDATION BY PLANNING COMMISSION. FIRE A FERGUSON WAS SUPPORT FROM AN AND HERMAN BURGESS THIS IS ALLOWABLE PER ORDINANCE. APPENDIX A ARTICLE ONE SECTION 33 DASH DASH SIX. SO

[00:05:09]

THE STATED BASIS FOR THE APPEAL . HERE ARE THE THREE ITEMS LISTED THAT WERE THE BASIS OF THE APPEAL. ONE WAS A FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE WILLIAMS MAN MULLEN 20 PAGE DOCUMENT DATED JULY 10TH 2023 TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND TO THE PUBLIC PRIOR TO THE AUGUST 17TH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. FURTHER IT WAS NOTED THERE WAS A LACK OF INPUT FROM FOUR GREG ADAMS AS WELL AS THE PETERSBURG PUBLIC SCHOOLS. AND IT WAS NOTED THERE ARE NO DRAWINGS ON HOW THE 18 WHEELER ACCELERATION LANE WILL LOOK AND IMPACT HIGHWAY 4 60. TO ADDRESS THESE ITEMS. I WANTED TO SHARE YOU WHAT THE BASIS FOR THESE WERE OR THE LACK OF BASIS FOR THESE WERE SO THE WILLIAMS MOMENT WILLIAMS MULLEN REPORT MAY HAVE BEEN DATED FROM JULY, BUT PLANNING STAFF RECEIVED IT ON AUGUST 16TH UPON RECEIPT OF THE DOCUMENT. WE DID UPLOAD IT INTO THE AGENDA AND MINUTES PACKET ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION SITE ON 8 17. IT WAS MADE AVAILABLE PRETTY MUCH AS SOON AS WE RECEIVED IT. PERFORM GREG ADAMS. WE DO HAVE A STAKE CODE THAT DOES STATE THAT IF ANY DEVELOPMENT IS LIKELY TO IMPACT A MILITARY INSTALLATION THAT THEY SHALL BE ENGAGED IN THE PROCESS AND HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR FEEDBACK. UM ONCE I WAS BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION WE DID GET, UH, CORRESPONDENT FOR GREG ADAMS, THE COLONEL JIM HEIMANN. WE SPOKE TO HIM ON SEPTEMBER 6 2023 AND SHARED THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE, INCLUDING THE PACKET. HE ACKNOWLEDGES THE AND SHARED IT WITH THE REST OF HIS TEAM AS WELL. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS SINCE THAT. ALSO IT WAS . THIS IS NOT A REQUIREMENT. UM THE ADJOINING NEIGHBORHOODS AND ADJOINING PROPERTIES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE NOTIFIED PER OUR CODE WERE NOTIFIED, BUT IT WAS REQUESTED THAT THE SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT SHOULD BE INFORMED SINCE OUR BUS ROUTES THAT MAY POTENTIALLY BE ON THE ROUTE WHERE THESE TRUCK TRAFFICS WILL BE GOING. SO WITH THAT STUFF, TOOK IT UPON THEMSELVES TO TRY AND GET IN TOUCH WITH THE SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT. WE CALLED ON SEPTEMBER 6TH FOLLOWED BACK UP ON SEPTEMBER 13TH AND FINALLY WERE ABLE TO GET AN EMAIL ADDRESS FROM STAFF FOR THE SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT TO SEND THE PACKET HER WAY, LETTING HER KNOW WHEN THE DATE OF THIS MEETING WAS AND NOTIFYING HER IF SHE WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE ANY FEEDBACK ON THIS CASE. COULD YOU ADVANCE THE SLIDE, GARRETT? THANKS. THE LAST ITEM WAS REGARDING AN ACCELERATION LANE AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT. THERE IS NO PROPOSED ACCELERATION LANE. I BELIEVE THIS IS JUST A MISUNDERSTANDING FOR THE TRAFFIC STUDY WHAT WAS REQUIRED AS AN INBOUND TAPER LANE, UM, TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE COMING TO THE SITE. AND THEN I JUST WANTED TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION. THE PROPOSED ROUTES OF WHERE THE TRUCKS WILL BE COMING FROM THAT BECOMING FROM ATLANTA. THEY'LL BE COMING FROM D. C IT'S LIKELY THAT THESE ROUTES WON'T BE GOING ANYWHERE NEAR FORT GREG ADAMS, SO I JUST WANT TO PUT THAT ON THE MAP AS WELL. SO YOU'LL SEE WHERE THE AREAS OF IMPACT OUR PER TRAFFIC SO THAT IS THE CASE FROM THE CITY SIDE. UM WE BELIEVE THAT WE ADDRESSED ALL THE CONCERNS THAT WERE RAISED AS WELL AS SOME OF THE CONCERNS. WE BELIEVE WE'RE NOT CONCERNS IN THE FIRST PLACE.

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. WE DO HAVE THE APPELLANT HERE AS WELL AS APPLICANT HERE TO ALSO SPEAK TO YOU ALL.

THANK YOU, MR MARK ANY QUESTIONS? FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. ALL RIGHT. COUNCILOR MYERS. A MOVE THAT WE DENY YOU, MR MAYOR, AND MRS SARDENBERG DOES THE APPLIQUE THE APPELLANT HERE? AS WELL. YES, HE IS HERE TO SPEAK. OKAY. THANK YOU. RIGHT? FERGUSON. HOW YOU DOING, MR MAYOR? THANKS EVERYBODY FOR HAVING ME AND SO THIS IS KIND OF BEEN HONESTLY A DEBACLE FROM THE BEGINNING. UM THIS IS NOT BEEN ROLLED OUT BY THE CITY. WELL AT ALL, THIS IS A MAJOR PROJECT. SCHOOLS WEREN'T CONTACTED. FOUR GREG ADAMS WERE NOT CONTACTED. THE AMOUNT OF CITY SCHOOL BUS STOPS THAT ARE IN THIS AREA. 14 OR 16 OF THEM.

THERE'S ALREADY A MASSIVE ISSUE WITH TRAFFIC ON THIS ROAD AND ON THIS CORRIDOR, PARTICULARLY UM YOU KNOW, SO I FELT LIKE IT WAS IMPORTANT THAT WE GET THE CITY SCHOOL INPUT AND ALONG WITH GREG

[00:10:04]

ADAMS. THE CITY JUST RECOMMENDED THAT THERE'S NO IMPACT FOR GREG ADAMS ARE FULLY DISAGREE, BECAUSE THERE'S AT LEAST 30% OF TRAFFIC. IT'S GOING TO BE SPIKING ON THIS ROAD. AND THAT'S GOING TO BE DEALING WITH FOUR GREG ADAMS AND EVERYTHING IS GONNA BE GOING ON ON THAT MAIN ROAD GOING TO GREG ADAMS. BUT THE BIGGEST THING IS THE CITIZENS ON AUGUST 17TH AND ON THE PRIOR PLANNING COMMISSION FULLY DISADVANTAGED. ON THE FIRST ROUND. WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED ABOUT THIS AT ALL, OR SOME OF THEM WEREN'T THE ONES WHO WERE NOTIFIED, HAD TWO DAYS TO BREAK IT OUT AND GET INTO THE 50 SOME PAGE DOCUMENTS. UM THE PHONE NUMBERS THAT WERE ON THE LETTER FROM THE CITY. WE'RE NOT BEING ANSWERED. OKAY. SIGNS WERE NOT PUT UP ON THE LOT. OKAY THAT WAS ROUND ONE. ROUND TWO WAS AUGUST 17TH. THERE WAS A 20 PAGE REBUTTAL BY WILLIAMS MULLEN.

THAT NOBODY SAW THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS HERE DISCUSSING HOW OUR LAND IS GOING TO BE EITHER USED OR NOT USED AND BE ABLE TO BUFFER THE TREES AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. NO ONE HAD SEEN THIS DOCUMENT. AND EVEN WHEN I PUT ON THE LINK AND SENT BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE NOT OUT THERE, WE SAW THIS. MAYBE 10 DAYS LATER, OKAY, SO IT WAS NOT ON THE DOCUMENTS. BRAGA 17TH PLANNING COMMITTEE. SO THE CITIZENS WERE NOT FULLY AWARE OF WHAT WAS GOING ON. AND I THINK THAT THAT'S I THINK THAT'S WRONG TO DO THAT. AND I UNDERSTAND THAT MISTAKES ARE MADE FULLY GET THAT. BUT WHEN YOU HAD THE FIRST ROUND WHERE A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE NOT NOTIFIED, AND IT WAS, IT WAS FUMBLED. IT WAS NOT DONE CORRECTLY AND THE SECOND ROUND.

WE DID NOT GET THE REBUTTAL FROM WILLIAMS MULLEN. THIS HAS ABSOLUTELY 100% THIS DISADVANTAGE THE CITIZENS THAT ARE FIGHTING THIS. OKAY BECAUSE THERE'S A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF SAFETY ISSUES HERE, WITH THE TRAFFIC ALREADY. AND IT'S GONNA GET WORSE. AND THERE ARE KIDS THAT ARE RUNNING ACROSS THE ROAD FROM THE HOTEL'S RIGHT THERE. THIS IS GOING TO BE A BAD AREA TO DEAL WITH. IF YOU ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. THIS IS GOING TO CAUSE A LOT OF PROBLEMS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. I BELIEVE THE REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE DEVELOPER MAYBE HERE AS WELL. MR GRAHAM. YES THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. MR ALTMAN AND MR WILLIAMS. I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THIS. VERY NARROW ISSUE. THE WILLIAMS MULLEN LETTER DATED JULY 10 WAS THE ONE THAT I SENT OR ASKED BE SENT TO COUNCIL SOMETIME AGO. AH TO GIVE SOME BACKGROUND ON THESE ISSUES. MY FIRST OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH MS SEE ODD MARK. WITH THE PLANNING DIRECTOR. AH I SHOWED HER THAT LETTER IN THE HOPE THAT THAT WOULD HELP ADVANCE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE BACKGROUND. OF WHAT HAD HAPPENED AND WHAT THE ISSUES WERE AND THAT SORT OF THING. SHE WANTED TO SEND THAT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, WHICH I THOUGHT WAS JUST FINE. SO THAT THEY WOULD ALSO HAVE, UH, SOME BACKGROUND ON THIS THAT THEY HAD NOT SEEN PREVIOUSLY. SO THAT'S THE HISTORY OF THE LETTER. IT WAS NOT A REBUTTAL LETTER IT WAS WRITTEN. TWO MONTHS BEFORE IT ACTUALLY WENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. IT WAS SIMPLY TO HELP HER GET FULLY UP TO SPEED ON THE ISSUES THAT WERE INVOLVED IN THIS CASE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, MR WILLIAMS ANYTHING I THINK THAT'S ALL THE PEOPLE THAT ARE HERE TO SPEAK ON IT, OKAY? OKAY. COUNCILMAN JONES. THIS. MR WILLIAMS, LET ME KNOW.

OKAY? OKAY? WHAT DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT? OKAY? YES, SIR. YES. APARTMENT. HOW Y'ALL DOING THIS EVENING? HOW YOU DOING? MY NAME IS RICHARD BURGESS. I'M HERE, REPRESENTING SHIRLEY AND HERMAN BURGESS AT 24. 90 POLE. AIN'T PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA, AND WE ARE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS. UM, THIS DEVELOPMENT MR MAYOR. THIS ISSUE DOES NOT INVOLVE THE DEVELOPMENT . THIS INVOLVES THE APPEAL. IF HE WANTS TO SPEAK ON THE DEVELOPMENT ITSELF, THEN HE CAN SPEAK. IF THIS MATTER PROCEEDS AT THE REGULAR MEETING, UNDERSTAND? DO EXCUSE ME. AND SO I WILL CONCUR WITH MR RAY FERGUSON IN REGARDS TO THE PEEL. OKAY THANK YOU. AND NEXT, WE HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THE NEXT MEETING. ALRIGHT, NEXT, COUNCILMAN JONES. ALL RIGHT, UM SO. COUPLE OF THINGS I WANT TO

[00:15:14]

ADDRESS EVERYBODY. I'VE WITNESSED IN THE PAST. ISSUES. DEALING WITH NOTIFYING.

RESIDENTS. WHAT'S GOING ON. IN OUR CITY WHEN IT COMES TO ZONING AND PLANNING AND THINGS THAT NATURE LIKE YOU SAID. PEOPLE MAKE MISTAKES, BUT I GOTTA SAY. HOW HARD IS IT? FOR US TO SEND OUT NOTICE. JUST EVERYBODY. IN THAT AREA. DON'T CAUSE THAT MUCH THE SAME WAY WE SEND WATER BILLS. TO MAKE SURE THINGS ARE DONE THE RIGHT WAY AND THE PROPER WAY. TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE NOTIFIED. UM I DON'T NEED AN ANSWER. I JUST WANT TO JUST SAYING IT, UH, IT'S IMPORTANT THAT EVERYBODY IN THAT AREA GET NOTIFIED. EVERY WAY THAT WE CAN POSSIBLY NOTICE THAT NEWSPAPER NEWS. WATER BILL. NEWSLETTER. EMAILS. IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE NOTIFY THE PEOPLE. NOW. IF WE'RE GONNA DO THINGS THE RIGHT WAY WE HAVE TO GO ABOVE AND BEYOND AND MAKING SURE THAT HAPPENS. GOT A QUESTION FOR THOSE WHO ARE AGAINST IT. WHEN THE TIME COMES.

I UNDERSTAND WHY YOU'RE AGAINST IT. I DO. BUT ONE THING THAT COMES TO MY MIND IS WHILE WE AGAINST THIS NOW. YOU HAVE KIDS OUT THERE. STAYING AT HOTELS. RUNNING ACROSS THE STREET. LIKE YOU SAID. I SEE NOBODY. SAY NOTHING FOR THEIR SAFETY, THEN. BUT ALL OF A SUDDEN WHEN YOU THINK A FEW TRUCKS IS COMING THROUGH NOW THEIR LIFE MEANS SOMETHING. IT'S BEEN MEANT SOMETHING. WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN WORRIED ABOUT SAFETY ISSUES ALONG THAT CORRIDOR, NOT BECAUSE OF SOME DEVELOPMENT WANT TO COME THROUGH. SO I WANT EVERYBODY TO THINK CLEAR. AND MAKING SURE WE'RE NOT BEING SELFISH WITH THIS THING. AND MAKING SURE WE'RE NOT ONE SIDED. BECAUSE YOU GOT A LOT OF KIDS. DID I DISAGREE WITH STANDING HOTELS? I FIRMLY DISAGREE WITH THAT. WHY WOULDN'T WE BE CONCERNED ABOUT? THEIR LIVES. THEN BEFORE THIS DEVELOPMENT CAME THROUGH. WANT TO COME THROUGH. I GOTTA. CHINA UP ON THAT CAN'T JUST BE FOR YOURSELF. NOT NOW. NOT EVER. WE NEED TO WORRY ABOUT ALL OF US AS A WHOLE. SO WE GET BACK TO THIS THING AND COME BACK TO IT. I WANT TO HAVE A MEETING WITH EVERYBODY IN THAT AREA TO MAKE SURE THAT I'M CLEAR ON WHERE YOUR MINDSET IS THAT AND WE NEED TO INVOLVE THOSE PARENTS AND THOSE KIDS THAT THOSE HOTELS BECAUSE I DO NOT LIKE THEM OVER THERE NEITHER THEN WHEN IT COMES TO SAFETY I THINK THIS COUNCIL CAN HANDLE THE SAFETY ISSUES WE CAN PUT UP LIGHTS WE COULD DO WHATEVER IT TAKES. THAT IS A DANGEROUS QUARTER BUT UNDERSTAND IT WAS MADE FOR TRAFFIC. IT WAS A BACK WAY FOR FOURTHLY. AND BUSINESSES. A TRACTOR TRAILERS. WE JUST HAPPENED TO ALLOW TRAILER PARKS AND HOTELS. FOR KIDS AND PEOPLE GOT TO TRAVEL ACROSS THE STREET. WE HAVE MADE A MESS OF THIS WHOLE THING IN THE CITY, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU GET CHANGING OF THE GUARDS. YOU KNOW YOU GOT ONE GROUP. ALLOWING HOTELS AND TRAILER PARKS ANOTHER GROUP, THEY WON'T DEVELOPMENT. AND WE GOTTA FIX IT. BUT WE GOTTA FIX IT, MAKING SURE WE'RE FAIR, MAKING SURE WE ARE. LETTING PEOPLE KNOW BUT WE WANT THE PEOPLE. I WANT THE PEOPLE A LOT OF Y'ALL WHO ARE DISAGREEING WITH IT. DON'T JUST BE A DISAGREEMENT WITH IT NOW. WORRY ABOUT THEM. KIDS SAFETY BEFORE THIS DEVELOPMENT AND AFTER WHETHER DEVELOPMENT GO THROUGH OR NOT. WE NEED TO PUT PRESSURE ON EACH OTHER, MAKING SURE THAT THAT'S A SAFE CORRIDOR FOR EVERYBODY. THAT'S ALL I GOT.

ALRIGHTY. ALRIGHT, COUNSELOR, MYERS. YES, SIR. I MOVE THAT WE DENY, UM THE REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL. VICE MAYOR HILL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. MADAM CLERK AND PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. MAMA

[00:20:09]

CUTHBERT, UH, COUNCIL MEMBER, JONES. I'M STAYING. COUNCIL MEMBER SMITH LEE HIGH COUNCIL MEMBER MYERS COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. VICE MAYOR HILL. FINE. MOTION PASSED

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.